Görme Engelli Bireylerde Postüral Stabilite Eğitimlerinin Postüral Stabilite ve Aktivite Performansına Etkisinin İncelenmesi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Özkan, E., Investigation of Effectiveness of Postural Stability Trainings on Postural Stability and Activity Performance on Individuals with Visually Impaired, Hacettepe University, Occupational Therapy Program of the Institute of Health Sciences, PhD Thesis, Ankara, 2018. This study was aimed to evaluate postural stability and occupational participation in individuals with visually impaired who their visual acuity is worse than 6/60 and to examine the effect of postural stability trainings applied to them. Study included randomly chosen 34 individuals with visually impaired who applied to Hacettepe University Vocational Rehabilitation Center. The Socio-demographic Information Form, postural stability assessment with Biodex Balance System and Canada Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM) were applied. Occupation-based postural stability training intervention (Group 1, n=17) was performed for a total of 24 sessions for two sessions per week for 12 weeks, with approximately 60 minutes for each session. The Group 2 (n=17) was given postural stability training with BBS only for 24 sessions in total for two sessions per week for 12 weeks, each session about 20 minutes. The evaluations were repeated after the trainings and the results were compared. As a result of our study, statistically significant difference was found between pre- and post-training measures in terms of postural stability values in both Group 1 and Group 2 (p<0.05). In terms of activity performance and satisfaction, it was found that there was no significant improvement in the Group 2, it was found that there was a statistically significant increase in the activity performance and satisfaction of the individuals in the Group 1 (p<0.001). Occupation-based postural stability training positively improves the level of postural stability and the performance and satisfaction levels of the activities experiencing performance problems in visually impaired individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".