MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010070062

Görme Engelli Bireylerde Postüral Stabilite Eğitimlerinin Postüral Stabilite ve Aktivite Performansına Etkisinin İncelenmesi

2018· dissertation· en· W7010070062 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance (ability)RehabilitationOccupational therapyVisual impairmentSession (web analytics)Significant difference
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Özkan, E., Investigation of Effectiveness of Postural Stability Trainings on Postural Stability and Activity Performance on Individuals with Visually Impaired, Hacettepe University, Occupational Therapy Program of the Institute of Health Sciences, PhD Thesis, Ankara, 2018. This study was aimed to evaluate postural stability and occupational participation in individuals with visually impaired who their visual acuity is worse than 6/60 and to examine the effect of postural stability trainings applied to them. Study included randomly chosen 34 individuals with visually impaired who applied to Hacettepe University Vocational Rehabilitation Center. The Socio-demographic Information Form, postural stability assessment with Biodex Balance System and Canada Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM) were applied. Occupation-based postural stability training intervention (Group 1, n=17) was performed for a total of 24 sessions for two sessions per week for 12 weeks, with approximately 60 minutes for each session. The Group 2 (n=17) was given postural stability training with BBS only for 24 sessions in total for two sessions per week for 12 weeks, each session about 20 minutes. The evaluations were repeated after the trainings and the results were compared. As a result of our study, statistically significant difference was found between pre- and post-training measures in terms of postural stability values in both Group 1 and Group 2 (p<0.05). In terms of activity performance and satisfaction, it was found that there was no significant improvement in the Group 2, it was found that there was a statistically significant increase in the activity performance and satisfaction of the individuals in the Group 1 (p<0.001). Occupation-based postural stability training positively improves the level of postural stability and the performance and satisfaction levels of the activities experiencing performance problems in visually impaired individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it