MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010100747

Functional Discomfort of Earplugs and its Influencing Variables

2023· article· en· W7010100747 on OpenAlexafffundvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersMitacsInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Work (physics)Identification (biology)Triad (sociology)Field (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Earplugs are extensively used as a preventive measure against noise-induced hearing loss. Nevertheless, their effectiveness is negatively impacted by the discomfort they induce, thereby influencing their consistent and proper use. In the context of earplug use, the comfort is defined as a multidimensional construct characterized by four dimensions: ‘physical’, ‘acoustical’, ‘functional’ and ‘psychological’. The (dis)comfort results from complex interactions between the triad constituted of the person wearing the earplug, his/her earplug, and his/her work environment. The objective of this paper is to enhance the understanding of the functional (dis)comfort induced by earplugs by identifying which triad characteristics can significantly influence the two attributes of this dimension: “functionality” (i.e., a general attribute) and “efficiency” (i.e., a specific attribute). Field assessments were conducted to evaluate the (dis)comfort of earplugs, involving 173 participants who tested different earplug models over seven weeks and provided a comprehensive comfort feedback through questionnaires. Triad characteristics were evaluated both on the field mainly through questionnaires, and in laboratory using comfort testers. Statistical analyses enabled the identification of key triad characteristics that influence functional comfort. Attributes of the functional comfort considered in this study are mainly governed by characteristics of the wearer: his/her previous experience with earplugs, his/her earcanal girth and a characteristic of the work environment: the interference of the earplug with other protective equipment The findings of this study hold the potential to provide manufacturers with tools for designing earplugs considering comfort aspects, as well as to help preventionists to recommend workers with earplugs that are best suited to individuals and work environment’s characteristics. © 2023, Canadian Acoustical Association. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207