MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010146533

HEFCE strategic review of sustainable development in higher education in England, Report to HEFCE by the Policy Studies Institute, PA Consulting Group and the Centre for Research in Education and the Environment, University of Bath

2008· book· en· W7010146533 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) · 2008
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEconomic and Social Research CouncilNational Centre for Earth ObservationUniversity of WestminsterRoyal College of ArtUniversity of BristolUniversity of SussexImperial College LondonManchester Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of LeicesterHigher Education Funding Council for WalesNatural Environment Research CouncilUniversity of WarwickUniversity of BathMiddlesex UniversityLondon South Bank UniversityTrent UniversityUniversity of GreenwichUniversity of Central LancashireHarper Adams UniversityKing's College LondonNottingham Trent UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthUniversity of EssexUniversity of DerbyBournemouth University
KeywordsHigher educationSustainable developmentPolicy developmentGroup (periodic table)Research policyResearch centrePublic policySustainabilityEducation for sustainable development
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueWestminsterResearch (University of Westminster)Same topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207