MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010146699

THE GRADUATES OF DORPAT PROFESSORIAL INSTITUTE -PROFESSORS OF A NEW FORMATION

2016· article· en· W7010146699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Leadership, and Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)Higher educationProfessional developmentAtmosphere (unit)Training (meteorology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present article contains the author's research results on the peculiarities of Professorial Institute graduates' academic activity. The Professorial Institute was founded in the first quarter of 19th century at Dorpat imperial university. The training system for professors of a new formation in this Institute is examined by the author as academic school. Due to the analysis of professional activities of the Professorial institute graduates, the author comes to a conclusion that this activity was impelled by the ideas about the role and image of a Russian university professor. These ideas were formed in the atmosphere of Professorial institute academic school. There were common essential features that characterize the graduates of the Professorial institute such as encyclopedic scientific knowledge, lecture skills, effective methods of teaching, methods of fostering students for investigation and teaching activities. Appealing to the history of professors training at Russian universities in the 19th century enables us to find reasonable solutions of the topical problems facing higher education system in the period of current reformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.634
GPT teacher head0.665
Teacher spread0.031 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicEducation, Leadership, and Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207