MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010160835

Hodnocení hospodaření zvolené obce

2014· dissertation· cs· W7010160835 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languagecs
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Term (time)Field (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bakalářská práce se zabývá samosprávním celkem, konkrétně městysem. Blíže pak bude v práci přiblížen investiční záměr daného městyse v letech 2009 - 2013. V praktické části je popsán městys Pecka z obecného hlediska, ale také finanční situace daného městyse. Středem bakalářské práce je pak investiční záměr, a to vybudování pozorovatelny na Krkonošské vyhlídce, financování projektu a možnosti dopadu provedení projektu na hospodaření městyse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0070.001
Research integrity0.0060.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrno University of Technology Digital Library (Brno University of Technology)Same topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207