MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010167706

24-Hour Movement Guidelines and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Relation to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Adolescents from Saudi Arabia

2023· dissertation· en· W7010167706 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Research Exeter (University of Exeter) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessContext (archaeology)DiseaseRecreationPhysical activityRisk factorPublic healthEpidemiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical activity in the form of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary behaviour in the form of recreational screen time (ST), and sleep, are individually associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in adolescents. Commonly, researchers investigate these three movement behaviours in relation to CVD risk factors in isolation. However, after the launch of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for children and youth, there have been calls to integrate all three 24-hour behaviours (PA, ST, & sleep). Furthermore, a scientific statement from the American Heart Association highlights the importance of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) as a measurement for health screening in children and adolescents as CRF is a strong predictor of CVD risk. Previous studies have individually explored how the 24-hour movement guidelines or CRF are associated with CVD risk factors in adolescents; however, which of the two (24-hour movement guidelines or CRF) is more strongly associated with CVD risk factors in adolescents is unknown. Currently, most studies have been conducted in North America and Europe, with the Middle East neglected, including Saudi Arabia, which has a very different lifestyle, environment, climate, school system, and culture compared to North America and Europe. Therefore, to address this gap in the literature in the context of Saudi Arabia, the studies included in this thesis aimed to investigate the prevalence of 24-hour movement guidelines and CRF and their relationship with CVD risk factors in adolescents from Saudi Arabia aged 12–15 years old. Chapter 4 narratively reviewed movement guidelines and CRF in relation to CVD risk factors in children and adolescents from the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries, which indicated gaps in the literature investigating the 24-hour movement guidelines. In addition, Chapter 4 highlighted that there is poor evidence for an association between single movement guidelines and CRF with multiple CVD risk factors; most studies have only examined associations with weight status. Chapter 5 examined the reliability and validity of using the Global School-Based Student Health Survey (GSHS) to assess the 24-hour movement guidelines in (n = 120; 50% females) adolescents aged 12–15 years old, from Saudi Arabia and found acceptable reliability and validity. In Chapter 6, the GSHS was used to examine the prevalence of the 24-hour movement guidelines and their associations with overweight/obesity in a sample of (n = 4224; 52% females) participants aged 12–15 years old. The results indicated that only 2.7% achieved the recommended 24-hour movement guidelines and highlighted weak, non-significant associations with the risk of overweight/obesity. In Chapter 7 a subsample of (n = 120; 50% females) participants aged 12–15 years old from the study in Chapter 6 underwent a 24-hour movement guidelines assessment using GENEActiv accelerometers (for MVPA and sleep) and the GSHS (for ST). In addition, CRF was assessed using the Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run test, and fasting blood samples, blood pressure, and anthropometrics were collected. None of the adolescents in this subsample met all three of the 24-hour movement guidelines, and there were no favourable significant associations with individual or clustered CVD risk factors. In addition, few males (16%) and almost half of the female (46.3%) participants had a healthy CRF. However, in males only, having a CRF was significantly and negatively associated with waist circumference (WC) and clustered CVD risk. Collectively, the results presented in this PhD thesis contribute to enhancing the literature in four ways. Firstly, it demonstrates that there is a lack of studies on the 24-hour movement guidelines and CRF in relation to CVD risk factors for adolescents from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Secondly, it is the first study to examine a questionnaire for its reliability and validity to measure the 24-hour movement guidelines, which found an acceptable reliability and validity. Thirdly, it shows that via a questionnaire few adolescents (2.7%) from Saudi Arabia are meeting the 24-hour movement guidelines, which is not significantly associated with being at risk of overweight/obesity. Lastly, it shows that when using device-based accelerometry, none of the adolescents from Saudi Arabia are meeting the 24-hour movement guidelines, which is not significantly associated with individual or clustered CVD risk factors profiles in both sexes. Moreover, healthy CRF was not significantly associated with individual or clustered CVD risk factors in females, while in males, healthy CRF was only significantly and inversely associated with WC and clustered CVD risk factors. Based on the above findings, it is suggested that 24-hour movement guidelines are not favourable strongly associated with individual or clustered CVD risk factors in adolescents of both sexes from Saudi Arabia. In addition, in females it appears that there are no significant associations between CRF and individual or clustered CVD risk factors. Initiatives should be developed to encourage male adolescents from Saudi Arabia aged 12–15 years old to achieve a healthy CRF to reduce the risk of WC and clustered CVD risk factors. However, future longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes would enable further insight into the associations between 24-hour movement guidelines and CRF in relation to CVD risk factors in adolescents from Saudi Arabia and should provide specific recommendations for both sexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Research Exeter (University of Exeter)Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207