MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010327195

Hip dysplasia in the cat (radiological signs and clinical importance in Québec)

2004· other· fr· W7010327195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2004
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCongenital diseaseDysplasiaLower limbDiseaseOsteochondrodysplasia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La dysplasie de la hanche est une malformation uni ou bilatérale de l'articulation coxo-fémorale. Chez le chat cette affection semble sous diagnostiquée. Dans cette étude, réalisée au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de St Hyacinthe, 100 radiographies en vue ventro-dorsale ont été sélectionnées entre juin 1993 et septembre 2003. Chaque radiographie, évaluée simultanément par un radiologiste et l'auteur a été classée dysplasique ou non. 74 chats étaient de race domestique et 26 de 7 races pures différentes. La fréquence de la dysplasie était de 34% avec une prédisposition pour les chats de pure race. L'incongruence articulaire, l'ostéoarthrose, l'usure du rebord acétabulaire crânial et le remplissage acétabulaire sont les lésions radiologiques les plus fréquentes. Contrairement au chien, les lésions de la tête et du col fémoraux sont peu rencontrées. La présence de signes cliniques associés à la dysplasie est variable et indépendante de la sévérité des lésions radiologiques. L'arthroplastie de la hanche par exérèse de la tête et du col fémoraux est le traitement de choix pour un chat dysplasique présentant des signes cliniques perdurant après un traitement médical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207