Impacto de la pandemia del Covid -19 en la enseñanza del derecho. El caso de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los objetivos del estudio han sido evaluarel nivel de satisfacción de los docentes yestudiantes de pregrado con las actividadesacadémicas no presenciales, comparandodeterminados aspectos con las actividadespresenciales que se venían desarrollandonormalmente hasta el año 2019; así comoconocer si se había producido una disminuciónsignificativa de la cantidad de estudiantes,producto de la pandemia. La investigacióncorresponde a un diseño no experimentaldescriptivo de corte transversal. Para laobtención de la información empírica, quedebe responder al primer objetivo del estudio,se aplicaron dos cuestionarios estructurados,uno para estudiantes y otro para docente. Parael segundo objetivo se analizó la estadísticaoficial. Para el estudio, se encuestaron a 158docentes y a 1025 estudiantes. Los resultadosmuestran que 73.5% de los estudiantes y 96.0%de los docentes estuvieron satisfechos, enalguna medida, con las actividades académicasdesarrollados en la facultad, durante lapandemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".