MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010454926

How you like my Cut?

2020· article· en· W7010454926 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Feminist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryPerformative utteranceFeminismHuman sexualityPleasureSemiotics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peaches is pop, she is feminism and she is performance, she is pleasure and danger as well. Her work has the incredible ability to condense the long path traversed by the body as representation and the evolution of feminist thought and action. Her proposal refreshes the paradoxes present within the normalization of sexuality and thanks to that, some of them, the most obvious ones, find a new place within performative practices. Hers is a complex discourse that shares elements and stereotypes with a divergent popular imaginary and which through experience ends up reflecting on the most academic side of the theory of feminism and its own “cuts”, cracks or contradictions. The three video clips by the canadian artist, Peaches, that we analyse here, serve as an example to point out the capacity that art has to open the semiotic discourse, addressing the most fundamental problems of the sex-political formulation. As Beatriz Preciado (2007) said, the new feminism is playful and reflexive, it is post-porno, punk and transcultural.; Peaches es pop, ella es feminismo y es performance, también es placer y es peligro. Su trabajo tiene la habilidad espectacular de resumir un largo camino recorrido por la representación del cuerpo y por la evolución del pensamiento y de la acción feministas. Su propuesta refresca las paradojas presentes en la normalización de la sexualidad e incluso las más evidentes acaban encontrando su lugar, a través de las prácticas performativas. Es un discurso complejo que comparte elementos y estereotipos con cierto imaginario popular divergente y que a su vez reflexiona con experiencia la teoría más académica del feminismo y sus grietas o contradicciones. Los tres videoclips de la artista canadiense Peaches aquí comentados, sirven como ejemplo para señalar la capacidad que tiene el arte de abrir el discurso semiótico, atajando hacia las problemáticas más fundamentales de la formulación sexo-política. Como Beatriz Preciado (2007) dijo, el nuevo feminismo es lúdico y reflexivo, es posporno, punk y transcultural.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it