MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010454926

How you like my Cut?

2020· article· en· W7010454926 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Feminist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryPerformative utteranceFeminismHuman sexualityPleasureSemiotics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peaches is pop, she is feminism and she is performance, she is pleasure and danger as well. Her work has the incredible ability to condense the long path traversed by the body as representation and the evolution of feminist thought and action. Her proposal refreshes the paradoxes present within the normalization of sexuality and thanks to that, some of them, the most obvious ones, find a new place within performative practices. Hers is a complex discourse that shares elements and stereotypes with a divergent popular imaginary and which through experience ends up reflecting on the most academic side of the theory of feminism and its own “cuts”, cracks or contradictions. The three video clips by the canadian artist, Peaches, that we analyse here, serve as an example to point out the capacity that art has to open the semiotic discourse, addressing the most fundamental problems of the sex-political formulation. As Beatriz Preciado (2007) said, the new feminism is playful and reflexive, it is post-porno, punk and transcultural.; Peaches es pop, ella es feminismo y es performance, también es placer y es peligro. Su trabajo tiene la habilidad espectacular de resumir un largo camino recorrido por la representación del cuerpo y por la evolución del pensamiento y de la acción feministas. Su propuesta refresca las paradojas presentes en la normalización de la sexualidad e incluso las más evidentes acaban encontrando su lugar, a través de las prácticas performativas. Es un discurso complejo que comparte elementos y estereotipos con cierto imaginario popular divergente y que a su vez reflexiona con experiencia la teoría más académica del feminismo y sus grietas o contradicciones. Los tres videoclips de la artista canadiense Peaches aquí comentados, sirven como ejemplo para señalar la capacidad que tiene el arte de abrir el discurso semiótico, atajando hacia las problemáticas más fundamentales de la formulación sexo-política. Como Beatriz Preciado (2007) dijo, el nuevo feminismo es lúdico y reflexivo, es posporno, punk y transcultural.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicGender and Feminist StudiesFrench-language works237,207