MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010504451

Informations-Technologie in Unternehmen und Haushalten 2004

2005· book· de· W7010504451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHdM ePub (Media University Stuttgart) · 2005
Typebook
Languagede
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicOccupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)Quarter (Canadian coin)UnemploymentOrder (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seit dem Jahr 2002 werden in fast allen Mitgliedsländern der EU harmonisierte Piloterhebungen zur Nutzung von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IKT) in Un ternehmen und privaten Haushalten durchgeführt. An diesen Piloterhebungen hat sich die deutsche amtliche Statistik seither, d.h. in den Jahren 2002, 2003 und 2004, betei ligt. In der vorliegenden Broschüre werden daraus ausgewählte Ergebnisse mit dem Schwerpunkt auf dem aktuellen Berichtsjahr 2004 sowie im europäischen Vergleich vorge stellt. Damit wird erstmalig die deutsche Position bei der IKT-Nutzung im europäischen Umfeld eingeordnet. Die Ergebnisse beziehen sich – sofern nicht anders erwähnt – jeweils auf das erste Quartal des Jahres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it