MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7010548745

Imagining adoption : filiation and affiliation in the works of Richard Wagamese

2007· dissertation· en· W7010548745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismIdentity (music)IdeologyMainstreamTheme (computing)MetaphorFace (sociological concept)Government (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis will explore the works of Richard Wagamese, focusing on his two novels Keeper'n Me and A Ouality of Light as they pertain to the theme of the adoption of Aboriginal children into non=Aboriginal homes with specifrc attention to the framework of colonialism and its relevance to the Sixties Scoop and how this has impacted the identity construction of those Aboriginal people affected.As the title suggests, how adoption is imagined in both novels explores the binaries of filial and affrliative relationships such as birth/adoptive and how this affects adoptees' sense of themselves as Aboriginal people in Canada.Through the figure of the intercultural Aboriginal adoptee ideas of what constitutes "Nativeness" such as appearance, culfural affrliatiorq and relationship to the land are subjected to thorough examination of how identity is both given and chosen.The other aspect to the project involves the fictive Aboriginal adoptee's search for belonging and how this can be seen as a metaphor for the larger issue that many displaced Aboriginal people face finding place and belonging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.050
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→