MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010554987

Investigating vectors for aquatic invasive species of tunicates in the Canadian shellfish aquaculture industry

2012· article· en· W7010554987 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIslandScholar (University of Prince Edward Island) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionTSG101ProteogenomicsArticular cartilage damageGestational periodDiafiltration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential spread of Didemnum vexillum through aquaculture transfers of Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) was investigated on the Sunshine Coast and the West Coast of Vancouver Island, BC. Pacific oysters from infested areas are regularly transferred for processing to non-infested areas thereby posing a risk of spreading D. vexillum to new areas. This observational study used concepts of the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) methodology to identify points (control processes, CPs) where the clusters of oysters received manipulations that could alter the amount of epibiont fouling, notably D. vexillum. Three control processes (CPs) were identified: 1) the harvesting procedure, 2) transportation from the harvesting area to the processing plant, and 3) shucking of the oysters and depositing fouled shells in non-infested waters. The percentage coverage of D. vexillum on oyster clusters was evaluated at each CP for product originating from two aquaculture sites, Lemmens Inlet and Okeover Inlet. The results from the assessment demonstrated a significant loss of fouling on C. gigas clusters at both sites from Post-Harvesting (CP1) to Post-Shucking (CP3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIslandScholar (University of Prince Edward Island)Same topicEducation Methods and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207