MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010560537

Implicit Navier-Stokes computations of unsteady flows using subiteration methods

2008· dissertation· en· W7010560537 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsComputationFlow (mathematics)Work (physics)Stability (learning theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A time-accurate, implicit numerical method for the two-dimensional compressible thin-layer Navier-Stokes equations is described. Subiteration techniques are used to solve the non-linear problem arising at each time step. The subiteration methods have been incorporated in the well-known implicit Navier-Stokes flow solver ARM, developed at the NASA Ames Research Center. Two different subiteration techniques are used. They employ similar methodologies used to solve steady-state problems such as approximate factorization, diagonalization, and local time-stepping. One scheme uses a single time-step value while the other uses a dual time-stepping approach where one time-step governs the temporal accuracy of the code and the second time-step is chosen to accelerate convergence at each iteration. Two modifications are made to the subiteration schemes to improve the efficiency of the code. The combined second and fourth-difference dissipation, which requires the inversion of a set of scalar pentadiagonal equations, is altered to use a modified second-difference dissipation scheme in the implicit operator, leading to a scalar tridiagonal form. The second modification consists of freezing the Jacobian matrices during the subiterations. Turbulent flow about an airfoil under buffet conditions is also considered. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207