MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010606480

Interviewee A [RIPESS interviews]

2011· dataset· en· W7010606480 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) · 2011
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidarityGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Ask priceSocial policyWorry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interview to the leader of the Social Solidarity Economy in Canada. Interviewed conducted as part as a PHD to be held at the Department of Technology and Information Systems, University of Minho under the theme "Interoperability in Web Based Information Systems (WIS) for the Social and Solidarity Economony (SSE)." The interview had as main goals: to understand the interoperability of the SSE WIS, to understand the SSE community in Canada, to understand the WIS of Canada; to understand the relationship of the SSE community with their world SSE counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1520.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207