MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7010626351

On the isotropy constant of random polytopes

2017· article· en· W7010626351 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónUniversidad de MurciaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPolytopeConvex hullConvex bodyRegular polygonIsotropyConstant (computer programming)Multivariate random variableRange (aeronautics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let X 1 , . . . , X N be independent random vectors uniformly distributed on an isotropic convex body K ¿ Rn , and let KN be the symmetric convex hull of Xi’s. We show that with high probability LKN = C log(2N/n), where C is an absolute constant. This result closes the gap in known estimates in the range Cn = N = n1+d. Furthermore, we extend our estimates to the symmetric convex hulls of vectors y1 X1, . . . , yN X N , where y = (y1, . . . , yN ) is a vector in RN . Finally, we discuss the case of a random vector y.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.097
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.097
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.010
Open science0.0050.007
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository)Same topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207