La identidad lingüística representada en testimonios de emigrantes ecuatorianos (Crítica)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors propose to interpret and demonstrate the linguistic identity of Ecuadorian emigrants who have gone to more developed countries, especially the United States, Canada, Spain, Germany and Great Britain. For this purpose, they draw on testimonial works written by the protagonists, whose publications range from 1996 to 2015. Following the orientation of theories derived from the social and human sciences, particularly linguistics, after the application of the methodology and techniques of bibliographic-documentary research, the authors conclude that there is a significant representation of four elements linked to the language and dialect used by emigrants while they remain outside Ecuador: problems faced by Ecuadorians due to lack of knowledge of the language used in the countries of arrival; interpersonal communication strategies used by emigrants until they acquire basic notions of the new language; differences in the use of Spanish between Ecuadorians and Spaniards; and assimilation of Spanish as a strategy for the integration of Ecuadorians in Spain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".