La società di Polaggia tra XIV e XV secolo. Primato politico e possibilità di arricchimento
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In questo contributo, utilizzando la documentazione notarile, si analizzano gli sviluppi della società di Polaggia tra il XIV e il XV secolo. Attraverso la schedatura dei residenti nella contrada, è emersa una bipartizione tra una maggioranza di contadini e un più ristretto e facoltoso ceto dirigente, proprietario di immobili, dedito alla pratica feneratizia e all’attività politica. Il settore agricolo, preponderante rispetto a quello pastorale, manifesta la sua fragilità durante le congiunture sfavorevoli. Questi momenti concorrono ad acuire il divario sociale ed economico della comunità, gettando i ceti meno abbienti in una condizione di profonda difficoltà e allo stesso tempo costituendo un’occasione di arricchimento per chi già dispone di liquidità. Inoltre, l’indagine della vita politica berbennasca fa emergere il rilievo dei Polaggini, sia numericamente sia per gli incarichi svolti. \nIn this article, based on notarial documents, the society development in Polaggia between the XIV and XV century has been analysed. By combing through the quarter residents’ records, a division among a majority of farmers and a scantier rich middle class group of home owners committed to usury has surfaced. The farming sector, much stronger if compared to shepherding, shows its vulnerability during unfavourable economic downtrends. These events concur to increase the social and economic gap of society, driving lower social classes to dire conditions. Conversely, more affluent social classes will enjoy a new thriving welfare. Besides, the analysis of Berbenno political life shows the hegemony of Polaggia both in terms of numbers and for accomplished assignments
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".