MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7010851415

La Societe de construction permanente de Levis, fondee en 1869. Incorporee par Actes du Parlement du Canada.

2014· article· fr· W7010851415 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForce majeureContext (archaeology)Pilotage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STATUTS REFONDUS DU BAS-CANADA. ACTE concernant les Sociétés deConstruction, chapitre 69.1859.SA Majesté, par et de l'avis et du consentement du Con- seil Législatif et de l'assemblée Législative du Canada, décrète ce qui suit : ; Les mem-4.Mais nul membre ne recevra, h même les fonds de bres no retella société, aucun intérêt ou dividende, sous forme de dc^rofite a ° revenu annuel ou autre profit périodique sur aucune avant que action dans la société, avant que le montant ou la valeur le montant (j e son action n'ait été réalisé, excepté lorsque tel mem-tion^ne soit me se retirera, suivant les règlements de la société alors réalisé.en force.12 V. c. 57, s. 1. La société g.Chaque telle société pourra recevoir de tout mempourrare-|3rc aucime somme de deniers sous forme de bonus, sur faiïius.Un des actions, pour l'avantage de la recevoir d'avance, avant qu'elle ait été réalisée, ainsi que tout intérêt pour les actions ainsi reçues ou pour aucune partie d'icelles, sans être censée contrevenir par là à aucune loi concernant l'usure.Ibid K s. 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→