Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The early eighteenth century was a vibrant period for European journalism. Already the author of several journals including the first spectator in French (<em>Le Misanthrope</em>), Justus van Effen attempted to capture the Regency spirit in France with <em>La Bagatelle</em>, also modelled on the English Spectator. Characterised by their overtly ironic tone, the <em>Bagatelliste</em>’s comments range from witty observations on contemporary society or literary controversies to bolder and more subversive reflections on the principles of inheritance or religious orthodoxy. Produced as a twice-weekly quarter sheet, <em>La Bagatelle</em> included short works of poetry and prose; brevity and stealth were its tools and its defences. <br/> In this first critical edition of <em>La Bagatelle</em>, James L. Schorr uncovers the sources of each periodical essay, and situates Van Effen’s ironic commentaries in their social and cultural context. Tracing the influence of classical as well as contemporary English writers, Schorr also explores an evolution in the character of the <em>Bagatelliste</em> himself, from the seventeenth-century ‘man of science’ to the <em>philosophe</em> of the Enlightenment. Containing substantive textual commentary and variants from the 1718-19 and 1722-24 issues, Schorr’s critical edition represents a major addition to our knowledge of early eighteenth-century French journalism and the intellectual climate in which it flourished. <br/><br/> Introduction: a <em>Spectator</em> for the Regency<br/> i. <em>Discours ironiques</em><br/> ii. Text<br/> <em>La Bagatelle, OU Discours ironiques où l’on prête des sophismes ingénieux au vice et à l’extravagance pour en faire mieux sentir le ridicule</em><br/> Appendix<br/> Selected bibliography<br/> Index<br/><br/> Published with kind support from the Dr. C. Louise Thijssen-Schoute Foundation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it