La linterna mágica: de la invención a la decadencia (siglos XVII-XX)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The magic lantern was an audiovisual medium based on the projection of images and the synchronic use of sounds that gained significant cultural transcendence between the 17th and 20th centuries. Its history began with the development of representative magic , that is, with the 18th century application of a series of physical principles that allowed images to be projected. In the following century, the magic lantern emerged as a device that became consolidated and institutionalised as a means of communication in the first three quarters of the 19th century. After its industrialisation and commercialisation in the last quarter of that century, it fell into decline during the first decades of the 20th century.; La linterna mágica fue un medio audiovisual basado en la proyección de imágenes y uso sincrónico de sonidos que alcanzó entre los siglos XVII y XX una significativa trascendencia cultural. Su historia se inició con el desarrollo de la "magia representativa ", es decir, con la aplicación durante el siglo XVII de una serie de principios físicos que permitieron la proyección de imágenes. En la siguiente centuria, la linterna mágica emergió como un dispositivo que acabó por consolidarse e institucionalizarse como medio de comunicación en los primeros tres cuartos del siglo XIX. Tras su industrialización y comercialización en serie, acaecida en el último cuarto de dicho siglo, sobrevino la decadencia de la linterna mágica durante las primeras décadas del siglo XX.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it