Las cooperativas de trabajo\n\nen medio urbano\n\nen el Québec (Canadá): condiciones de\n\nemergencia y potencial de desarrollo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Mediante una investigación-acciónse exploraron las condiciones de desarrollo y viabilidadde la cooperativa de trabajo (CT) como herramientade desarrollo local en el medio urbanoen el Québec.Se presenta un análisis histórico queexplica el escaso desarrollo de la CT en el Québecsi se compara con otros tipos de cooperativas.Apartir de estudios de casos y entrevistas con expertosen el campo de las cooperativas de trabajo,se analizan las condiciones de emergencia y desarrolloreciente de las CT. El examen de las relacionesde la CT con el desarrollo local en medio urbanolleva a concluir que el éxito de su implantacióndescansa en la adaptación de una voluntad yuna estrategia globales de desarrollo de las CT enfunción de los sectores empobrecidos. Se concluyecon algunas perspectivas para una estrategia depromoción de las cooperativas de trabajo en elQuebec."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".