Le nouveau Code de Droit Canonique - The New Code of Canon Law, Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Derecho Canónico, Ottawa, 19-25 de agosto 1984, publicadas bajo la dirección de MICHEL THERIAULT y JEAN THORN, Université Saint-Paul, Ottawa 1986, dos volúmenes, con un total de 1.166 pp [RECENSIÓN]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
las prelaturas personales aJ peculiaria opera pastoralia perlicienda, al hilo de la Consto ap.Ut sÍf, mediante la cual S.S. Juan Pablo 11 llevó a cabo la erección de la Prelatura de la Santa Cruz y Opus Dei.Cierra el volumen un artículo breve, a la par que sustancioso, sobre la consideración jurídica de la organización eclesiástica (cap.XIII).El autor apunta en él, tomando pie de la publicación del volumen I de El Derecho del Pue- blo de Dios por J. Hervada y P. Lombardía en 1970, una serie de consideraciones -muchas, compartidas con estos autores; otras, matizadas-utilísimas acerca del método y perspectiva propios del estudio jurídico de la organización eclesiástica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".