Los patios inclusivos: una medida para mejorar la convivencia escolar en un colegio de atención preferente a alumnado con discapacidad motora
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente Trabajo de Fin de Grado tiene como objetivo comprobar si los patios inclusivos mejoran la convivencia escolar en un centro de atención preferente a alumnado con discapacidad motora. Para averiguarlo se han planteado cuatro cuestionarios, dos para el alumnado y otros dos para el profesorado que tendrán que completarlo antes y después de la propuesta de patios inclusivos que se ha diseñado. Además, se realizará un análisis descriptivo de la situación inicial y final del centro educativo. También se compararán los resultados obtenidos en los cuestionarios desde los puntos de vista de los participantes pudiendo observar si tienen la misma opinión sobre la situación escolar. Estos resultados se relacionarán con otros estudios anteriores para terminar concluyendo, principalmente, que este tipo de patios fomentan la inclusión del alumnado con discapacidad y reducen la conflictividad en los centros educativos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".