Le peuplement de la seigneurie de Chambly, les alliances matrimoniales et l'enracinement : 1665-1740
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'étude du peuplement colonisateur de la seigneurie de Chambly entre 1665 et 1740 a permis de tracer un portrait des pionniers à partir des renseignements sur l'âge, le sexe, le statut matrimonial et la provenance. L'analyse des réseaux de parenté a montré des groupes apparentés en provenance de Boucherville. Laprairie et Longueuil mettant en évidence l'importance des liens familiaux et la solidarité de provenance lors de ces migrations. Attirés par un parent, ces pionniers ont pu profiter de l'opportunité d'un réseau de relations déjà établi. Sans parente à l'arrivée, les pionniers oui ont su s'allier les voisins par leur mariage ou celui de leurs enfants se greffent a un noyau déjà existant. La parenté, importante lors de la décision de s'établir des nouveaux calons, l'est aussi par la suite pour l'enracinement dans la nouvelle communauté.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".