L'engagement syndical au prisme de l'expérience de militantes dans des organisations syndicales québécoises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation focuses on the union experience of activists and aims to question the meaning that these unionized women give to their union commitment since their point of view is still too little exposed, as are the obstacles to which they continue to face both in the workplace and in trade unions. The objective is to grasp the personal interpretation of the activists as to the means and practices made available to them to overcome the various obstacles they encounter in order to detect the point of view of women active in the union with regard to these new strategies, as diverse as they are. In other words, it is a question of questioning their motivations to get involved in a union organization and to see, through the discourse of these unionized women as well as their militant path, how unionism could further improve the condition of women within its various bodies and structures, basing themselves first and foremost on their own union experience. This thesis is based on a corpus of 12 interviews conducted with unionized women in Montreal and from which I develop an analysis that attempts to expose the balance sheet of the latter regarding their militant trajectory and thus give voice to the solutions that 'they propose so that the unions can adapt their practices regarding the status of women and gender equality. At the end of this analysis, I highlight the words of the activists about the improvement of the status of women and all the issues that arise from it, in particular the reconciliation of work/family/unionism, and which still hinder the full integration of women into trade union organizations at all levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.033 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".