L'engagement syndical au prisme de l'expérience de militantes dans des organisations syndicales québécoises
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation focuses on the union experience of activists and aims to question \nthe meaning that these unionized women give to their union commitment since their point \nof view is still too little exposed, as are the obstacles to which they continue to face both \nin the workplace and in trade unions. The objective is to grasp the personal interpretation \nof the activists as to the means and practices made available to them to overcome the \nvarious obstacles they encounter in order to detect the point of view of women active in \nthe union with regard to these new strategies, as diverse as they are. In other words, it is a \nquestion of questioning their motivations to get involved in a union organization and to \nsee, through the discourse of these unionized women as well as their militant path, how \nunionism could further improve the condition of women within its various bodies and \nstructures, basing themselves first and foremost on their own union experience. \nThis thesis is based on a corpus of 12 interviews conducted with unionized women \nin Montreal and from which I develop an analysis that attempts to expose the balance sheet \nof the latter regarding their militant trajectory and thus give voice to the solutions that 'they \npropose so that the unions can adapt their practices regarding the status of women and \ngender equality. At the end of this analysis, I highlight the words of the activists about the \nimprovement of the status of women and all the issues that arise from it, in particular the \nreconciliation of work/family/unionism, and which still hinder the full integration of \nwomen into trade union organizations at all levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it