MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011183649

Latin American Boom and the Polisystem Movility: a Discussion on the Pascale Casanova Proposed

2014· article· en· W7011183649 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative and World Literature
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansBoomDialecticUniversalismGovernment (linguistics)Point (geometry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article attempts to establish a theoretical discussion before its application. Its starting point is Pascale Casanova’s thesis about the universalism of French literature, which will later be contested. Using comparative studies, the article will seek to challenge the static and stable concept of the world system that was developed by the French author. To achieve this, the proposed dialogue will explore Even-Zohar’s theory of polysytems, along with Françoise Perus´s ideas about the Latin American reality of heterogeneity being established from birth. This dialectical discussion will then be substantiated through a brief review of the circumstances and consequences of the Latin American boom, which was born in the ‘60s and ‘70s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it