Le âsoiâ dans trois textes québécois : déconstruction et reconstruction par lâautre.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of the âselfâ represents a crucial element in Québécois literature and culture. This âsoiâ should be not perceived as a fixed element, which cannot be modified. Quebec literature shows numerous examples of texts where mutating individuals struggle to find their âselvesâ. Migration is one part of the mutation process, and should be considered not only as a geographical, but also a social and mental migration, involving several inevitable encounters with the âotherâ. This âotherâ should be understood here as referring not only to personal encounters but as a generic term for all that is unknown, including the revelation of the unknown within the familiar and the development of new aspects within the self. Jacques Poulin, Marco Micone and Jean-Marc Vallée present us with various aspects of otherness that will participate in deconstructing the âselfâ as well as giving birth to ânewâ individuals. This work focuses on the impact of âleavingâ on identity. Among other critics and theorists Julia Kristeva has led debate on the questions of foreignness and otherness in order to address questions of identity. Inspired by her work, the analysis of Volkswagen Blues, Le Figuier enchanté and C.R.A.Z.Y. explores âothernessâ through different perspective, namely through the notions of métissage (Poulin), migration (Micone) and sexual identity (Vallée). While dealing with theses questions of multiculturality, hybridity and sexuality, reference will also be made as appropriate to theorists such as Homi Bhabha, Sheri Simon and Judith Butler. Jack, Pitsémine, Nino and Zac will all be shown to be on quests to understand and resolve a dislocated sense of âselfâ, which in turn relates to broader issues of identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".