The Long Wait (Part II): A Personal Account of Infantry Training in Britain, June 1942âJune 1943
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he last instalment of Hal MacDonald's letters ended with him experiencing a prolonged and frustrating period of rest and relaxation away from his unit.This was at Garnons, a convalescent home for Canadian officers near the Welsh border, run by the Massey family.It will be recalled that Hal was sent here to recuperate from a fracture to his wrist experienced in a bren gun carrier accident.While he was there he would also have an operation to correct a long-standing problem with his nose.He was told his nose would never be one hundred percent again and "if hit too hard it's likely to go into a funny shape or get broken.Doc warned me to always get in the first blow and hit hard," he wrote on 03 June 1943."Very sound advice!"A long letter of 28 and 29 June recorded a deep depression."I just can't stand this life of laziness.Can't do a thing with this wrist in a The Long Wait (Part II) A Personal Account of Infantry Training in Britain
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".