MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011227676

The Mars Database – Source Levels Measured for the Fleet Navigating the St. Lawrence Estuary

2023· article· en· W7011227676 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsInnovation MaritimeUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersTransport CanadaUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramEstuaryNoise (video)Variety (cybernetics)Data sourceTrajectoryUnderwater
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is assumed within the oceanographic community that anthropogenic noise can affect negatively a wide variety of marine species. To better assess its main source, the shipping noise, the MARS (Marine Acoustic Research Station) station consisting of vertical hydrophone arrays was deployed in the St-Lawrence Estuary along the upstream shipping lane. The station was designed to allow high quality measurement of the ships source levels following the ANSI/ASA S12.64-2009 and ISO-17208-1 standards. It is part of the MARS project which aims to study shipping noise both underwater and onboard ships and to propose reduction methods. Since 2021, a database of over 1000 acoustic signatures have been collected, including 173 high-resolution signatures from partner ships that followed an optimized trajectory for the acoustic measurements. This database will be used by governmental authorities, such as Transports Canada, for decision making regarding the shipping noise and by the scientific community for research purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207