LA VOIE LONGUE DE LA COMPRÉHENSION CHEZ PAUL RICOEUR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente estudo se propõe fazer valer que a verdadeira contribuição de Ricoeur à causa hermenêutica se apresenta diversas figuras de uma única. Ao modo de uma reconstrução, examinaremos algumas figuras que caracterizam de modo exemplar esta abordagem. A guisa de introdução do assunto, buscaremos primeiro, do lado dos mestres do Ricoeur, Gabriel Marcel e Karl Jaspers, as fontes possíveis de uma via longa na sua respectiva filosofia. Examinaremos em seguida quatro figuras que constituem meditações hermenêuticas: o desvio da consciência pelos saberes históricos, o padrão hermenêutico, a inserção do problema hermenêutico na fenomenologia e a dialética entre explicar e compreender. No fim do percurso, notaremos que a via longa da compreensão recobre diversas acepções, bem como se estende a todo projeto filosófico de Ricoeur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".