Lumberjacks, Muscular Christianity, and Nation Building: Creating an Aspirational Canadian Masculinity, 1820 – 1912
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the first half of the nineteenth century, Canadian lumberjacks were viewed by Upper Canada’s urban middle class as embodying transgressive masculinity due to the lumberjack’s lack of adherence to British Protestant middle-class social norms. In the second half of the nineteenth century, public perception of loggers slowly began to change, and the public started to view lumberjacks as a new masculine ideal and symbol of a Canadian national identity. Examining Canadian literature, both fiction and non-fiction, through gender and cultural history methodologies and interdisciplinary theoretical approaches, such as intersectionality, literary cartography, literary geography, and ecospatiality, can illuminate disseminated messages about masculinity in the logging industry. These messages were intended for a public audience that was often far removed from the actual life and work of the men toiling away in remote forests. As a result, the early nineteenth century saw lumberjacks being a source of concern for the moral well-being of the budding nation of Canada, with the violence of the early years of that century spreading worry and fear about loggers when they would return to town after their work season. Through religious messaging like pamphlets and preaching, the public gained an understanding of the contributions that loggers made to the economy, leading authors to begin to write loggers as aspirational characters. Canadian literature sought to reform the logger’s image into the embodiment of muscular Christianity by praising the loggers for their rugged manliness that allowed them to reclaim the masculinity that the authors believed was being taken from men who lived in effeminizing urban centres. Further, Canadian textual materials, in combination with missionary attempts to educate and reform loggers themselves, contributed to the Canadian lumberjack’s position as a representative of the Canadian nation’s ideals of masculinity. By focusing on remote and rural gender and cultural history in the Ontario logging industry, this thesis aims to track competing narratives surrounding representations of masculinity in the logging industry between 1820 and 1912 and their relationships to how the lumberjack became a popular modern Canadiana motif and symbol of nation building.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".