MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011257232

L'écotourisme au Nunavik : le marché et la culture

2014· other· fr· W7011257232 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2014
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourist destinationsGeographerContext (archaeology)Tourism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La diversification des destinations et formes touristiques donne naissance à l’écotourisme, terme désignant moins un répertoire particulier d’activités qu’un esprit, un idéal normatif basé sur la préservation de la nature et des cultures locales (souvent représentées comme traditionnelles) et l’amélioration des conditions de vie des collectivités hôtes. Ainsi, cette pratique peut apparaître comme une solution de remplacement, une critique, non seulement du tourisme de masse (fréquemment décrit comme véhiculant la destruction, les rapports superficiels, l’exploitation, etc.), mais du mode de vie actuel en général. Cependant, comme nous a permis de le constater un séjour sur le terrain au Nunavik auprès de promoteurs de l’industrie, l’écotourisme donne lieu à la manifestation de tendances caractéristiques de la postmodernité, l’amenant à être à la fois occasion d’expression et d’émancipation pour les communautés d’accueil, tout en étant soumis à un risque d’exploitation et de récupération par des logiques productivistes et de rentabilité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)Same topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207