MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011266636

L’incastellamento della pieve di sant’Andrea: la contessa Emilia e il pievano Rolando, 10 dicembre nel 1119

2020· book-chapter· en· W7011266636 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorence Research (University of Florence) · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)CONQUESTQuarter (Canadian coin)Reign
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 10 December 1119, in the Guidonis comitis room, or in the palace of Pistoia of the Guidi counts (imperial representatives), Imilia comitissa, wife of Guido Guerra (perhaps adopted son of the countess Matilde), in the name of her consort, granted the parish priest Rolando, custos et prepositus Plebis S. Andreae de Inpori, and to all the homines of the plebate: a. the right to build their houses around the parish church of Sant’Andrea; b. being able to surround houses with defensive walls. The parish thus strengthened its role of territorial reference; around it a permanent settlement originated in an area that was already the site of a market and a river port on the Arno. The resolution allowed for the fortification of the Romanesque baptismal risen centuries earlier and the fortification of numerous peoples who resided in small approximately fortified nuclei and in open villages, which arose in the vast area that went from the confluence of the Pesa to that of the Elsa in the Arno, ensuring them greater protection. \nIl 10 dicembre 1119, in camera Guidonis comitis, ovvero nel palazzo di Pistoia dei conti Guidi (rappresentanti imperiali), Imilia comitissa, moglie di Guido Guerra (forse figlio adottivo della contessa Matilde), a nome del consorte, concedeva al pievano Rolando, custos et prepositus Plebis S. Andreae de Inpori e a tutti gli homines del plebato il diritto di edificare le loro case intorno alla pieve di Sant’Andrea e di poterle circondare con mura difensive. La pieve rafforzava così il suo ruolo di riferimento territoriale, e intorno a essa ebbe origine un abitato stabile in una zona che era già sede di mercato e di un porto fluviale sull’Arno. La deliberazione consentì la fortificazione della battesimale romanica sorta secoli prima e l’incastellamento di numerosi popoli che risiedevano in piccoli nuclei approssimativamente fortificati e in villaggi aperti, sorti nella vasta area che andava dalla confluenza della Pesa a quella dell’Elsa nell’Arno, assicurando loro una maggiore protezione.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlorence Research (University of Florence)Same topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207