L’expérience d’adultes ayant vécu l’unschooling : une approche \nphénoménologique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour mieux comprendre l’expérience de l’unschooling, des entretiens en profondeur non directifs avec cinq adultes québécois l’ayant vécue ont été menés selon une approche phénoménologique, révélant les perceptions de leur vécu éducatif et de leur famille, ainsi que leur vision du monde. Certains aspects des témoignages corroborent les résultats d’études antérieures concernant l’autodidaxie, l’usage des technologies de l’information, le développement des intérêts et la participation au groupe de soutien; d’autres relèvent des limites quant à l’apprentissage de la persévérance, la poursuite d’objectifs d’apprentissage complexes, l’intégration scolaire et l’évaluation. Les participants parlent aussi de conflits familiaux, d’emprise parentale, de négligence et de l’influence de cette expérience sur leur vision de la société, du travail, du système scolaire et du rôle de l’État en éducation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".