MDOCS Slide-2015-09-30, Kevin Coleman: The Photos We Don't Get to See
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is much we can learn from photographs, both those created for public view and those developed for private viewing or institutional purposes. From a case study drawn from the United Fruit Company's early 20th century activities in Latin America, historian Kevin Coleman offered a lecture and a workshop to help bring these documentary resources into focus and tease out the stories they help reveal. Event details: 9/30 @ 5:30pm: The Photos We Don't Get to See: Sovereignties, Archives, and the 1928 Massacre of Banana Workers in Colombia In 1928, five men posted for a picture in Magdalena, Colombia. A United Fruit Company supervisor subsequently sent that same photo, along with a memo describing each of the subjects depicted, to managers in the company's other divisions, including the one in Bocas del Toro, Panama, where the photo and memorandum were discovered by an anthropologist some 50 yrs later. From the stray fragments that have leaked out of an archive that refuses to let us in, we can begin to retrace the images that we cannot see and the futures that capital and the state violently cut short. 10/1 @ 9:30am: Storytelling with Archival Images An introduction to thinking through historical photography and photographs to recharge pasts that threaten to be forgotten. Attendees developed a set of conceptual and methodological tools for analyzing photographic images. Kevin Coleman Coleman is Assitant Professor in Historical Studies at the University of Toronto. He is a historian of modern Latin America, specializing in the history of U.S.-Latin American encounters and visual culture. He is currently working on a history of photography and political culture in a banana-company town on the Caribbean Coast of Central America and finishing up his first book, A Camera in the Garden of Eden: The Self-Forging of the Banana Republic, which features over one hundred rare photographs. In the book, he argues that Honduras, a “banana republic,” was an imperial constellation of images and practices that was locally checked and contested by the people of the town of El Progreso, where the United Fruit Company (now known as Chiquita Brands) had one of its main divisional offices. As banana plantation workers, women, and peasants posed for pictures and, more emblematically, staged the General Strike of 1954, they forged new ways of being while also visually asserting their rights as citizens. Coleman feels that photography offers a unique perspective into history, and into social and political movements. “If you are able to work with photographs as historical documents, but also as objects that communicate in ways that are different from texts, or from other aspects of material culture, then we have access to the subjectivities of people that are otherwise not present in the historical record,” says Coleman. He explains that in many instances photographs are the only documentary evidence left behind by some of the banana workers and that these image objects offer insights into the lives they lived, along with an opportunity to “retrieve histories” that have otherwise been decimated. --Carla DeMarco, "FreezeFrame" In addition to training in history and philosophy, Coleman has dedicated himself to serving others in remote Central American, as well as urban North American, communities. The two and a half years that he spent as a Peace Corps volunteer in southern Honduras—living and working with campesinos and developing friendships that continue to this day—provided the impetus that led to the research for his forthcoming book and enabled him to gain a rich body of experiences that he draws upon as he teaches Latin American history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".