Marrakech: Le premier minaret almohade de Marrakech
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two centuries ago, Marrakech appeared to be a heap of scattered ruins and empty land, some of which was cultivated. In any case, this is the image that Ali bey chose to represent the city in which he stayed in 1804. Two towers dominate the landscape that he had drawn ten years later in Paris to illustrate the account of his travels. One is easily recognisable, the minaret of the Kutubiyya Mosque, the other has remained mysterious. If this tower did exist, Ali Bey’s engraving shows it partially ruined. A century later, it had disappeared. Was it a bastion of the qar al-ajar or the minaret of the first Almohad mosque? Perhaps both answers are correct, as the first tower may have served as the base for the second? "is is what this paper aims to clarify, by gathering and comparing the available historical and iconographic material, and then by proposing an architectural critique of the building on the basis of the records of the excavations carried out on the site. Based on these different elements, this paper will finally present, in the form of a graphic hypothesis, a history of the evolution of this tower in the centre of a quarter where some of the most emblematic buildings of Marrakesh were built.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".