MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011392396

A machine learning framework for public transport ridership estimation using multi-source data fusion with low-cost bluetooth data

2024· other· en· W7011392396 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAaltodoc (Aalto University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre interuniversitaire de recherche sur les reseaux d'entreprise, la logistique et le transportEuropean CommissionHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeSveučilište u Zagrebu
KeywordsBluetoothDronePublic transportGround truthSensor fusionRandom forestRaw dataEnsemble learning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate information about demand volumes at certain locations within public transport networks is critical to making informed decision by transportation planners. Traditional manual counts to collect volumes, while accurate, are costly and labour intensive. Existing automatic passenger counting systems also face limitations in terms of cost, accuracy, or compatibility. This paper proposes a multi-source data fusion framework to improve the ca-pability of passenger counting using a low-cost Bluetooth sensor. The frameworks combine otherwise independent and unrelated raw Bluetooth counts, novel drone data and freely available General Transit Feed Specification - Real-Time and ferry schedule data into a unified and comparable format. The proposed framework leverages the advance capabilities of various machine learning models, K-Nearest Neighbour, XGBoost and Random Forest to estimate ridership of public transport vehicles in an area affected by nearby ferry operations. The results demonstrate the models generated using the framework achieve high accuracy and low errors when compared to the ground truth of manual counts. Machine learning model vastly outperform standard Linear Regression model with a R2 value of 0.86 compared to 0.62. Models incorporating variables develop from the framework significantly outperform those that rely solely on Bluetooth data (R2 of 0.86 vs -0.49). Notably, the framework is still able to draw similar conclusion when utilizing the drone counts as the ground truth which expose the model with significantly more data points then manual counts. However, discrepancy between manual count and drone count highlight the need for further validation to enhance the reliability of this approach. Nevertheless, the framework highlights the value of multi-sensor data fusion as a necessary enhancement to improve the utility and accuracy of the low-cost Bluetooth count.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAaltodoc (Aalto University)Same topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207