MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011410633

Managing arthritis through activity: Do pain acceptance and negative disease outcome expectations reflect motivational differences among the active and inactive?

2015· article· en· W7011410633 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArthritisCognitionSocial cognitive theoryDiseaseOutcome (game theory)Joint painRheumatoid arthritis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although physical activity (PA) is a proven arthritis-management strategy, many individuals with arthritis are inactive. Motivating the inactive requires an understanding of whether social cognitions linked to PA differ between active and inactive individuals. According to social cognitive theory, individuals’ negative outcome expectations (OE-likelihood; OE-distress) about the impact of PA on their arthritis may differ (e.g., PA causes joint stiffness). However, PA-negative OE research is limited as the focus tends to be on positive OEs. Further, individuals who are active at differing levels also differ in arthritis pain acceptance (i.e., willingness to engage in valued activities). To date, pain acceptance differences between the active and inactive have not been investigated. Our purpose was to examine whether adults with medically-diagnosed arthritis (Mage=49.91 years) who were active (n=156) or inactive (n=97) differed in negative disease-related OEs (OE-likelihood; OE-distress) and pain acceptance. A between groups MANCOVA controlling for body mass index and arthritis pain was significant (p<.01). Follow-up ANOVAs revealed that actives reported significantly less negative OE-likelihood (partial eta squared=.08), less OE-distress (partial eta squared=.13), and more pain acceptance (partial eta squared=.06) versus their inactive counterparts (p’s<.01). Findings support theory and are the first to illustrate that disease- and activity-related social cognitions differ among active and inactive adults with arthritis. Continued investigation of differences may lead to knowing which social cognitions should be targeted for motivational improvement among the inactive, and whether tailoring of improvement strategies would vary as a function of pain acceptance. Funding: CIHR; Saskatchewan Health Research FoundationAcknowledgments: CIHR;Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207