MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011449655

MGR GEOFFREY ROBINSON, Mariage, divorce et nullité. Une introduction a la procédure suivie dans les causes de déclaration en nullité dans l'Église catholique, Novalis/Le Chalet, Ottawa 1986, 95 págs [RECENSIÓN]

2018· other· fr· W7011449655 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDeposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) · 2018
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationContext (archaeology)Subject (documents)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une introduction a la procédure suivie dans les causes de déclaration en nullité dans l'Eglise catholique, Novalis/Le Chalet, Ottawa 1986, 95 págs.De orientación nítidamente pastoral, esta breve obra es una adaptación francesa de Marriage, divaree and nultity (1984).El actual Obispo auxiliar de Sidney nos presenta, en siete capítulos muy asequibles, el matrimonio y el procedimiento judicial en las causas matrimoniales.Su experiencia forense se pone de manifiesto en el arte con el cual vulgariza los conceptos y los términos técnicos.' Los capítulos 1 y V presentan el proyecto de Dios sobre el matrimonio.Recuerdan que el vínculo sacramental -símbolo de la unión entre Jesucristo y la Iglesia-seguirá uniendo a los esposos hasta la muerte de uno de ellos.Mientras la vida conyugal teje una serie de vínculos (emocional, físico, moral, legal) que pueden llegar a ser quebrantados, el vínculo matrimonial que deriva del sacramento es indisoluble.El autor precisa que el inciso de S. Mateo «a no ser en caso de fornicación» (19,8-9) no puede interpretarse como una excepción al principio de indisolubilidad sin contradecir la firme afirmación de S. Marcos 10,11-12.Los capítulos II y III contemplan las influencias «internas» y «externas» en el fracaso del matrimonio.Se pasa revista a unos cuantos factores que, desde un punto de vista meramente humano, pueden hacer más fácil el éxito de la comunidad de vida y de amor.Sigue una lista de cuestiones prácticas y concretas que pueden resultar útiles en la preparación de los futuros cónyuges, ayudándoles a madurar su decisión

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDeposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra)French-language works237,207