MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011481021

The Microphysical Properties and Sensitivities of Marine Fog

2024· other· en· W7011481021 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolRadiative transferCloud computingClimate modelAtmospheric modelRadiative coolingCloud physicsMarine stratocumulus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marine fog presents a modeling challenge. Accurate forecasts rely on understanding the unique behaviors of a variety of of marine fog types, but the marine environment is remote, and a lack of observations has contributed to a limited understanding. Cloud base lowering (CBL) in which radiative cooling at the top of a stratus cloud leads to the downward growth of cloud base and the formation of fog, is one of the more common ways that marine fog forms. However, relatively little work has been devoted to the influence of microphysics on the formation and evolution of CBL fog. This gap is addressed here by pairing multiple modeling experiments conducted using different models, microphysics schemes, and case setups with in situ observations. This dissertation provides insights into aspects of marine fog that can be used to inform future research and improve forecasts.Chapter 2 uses a marine fog event that occurred near Canada’s Grand Banks to investigate the sensitivity of simulated fog properties to six model parameters found primarily in the microphysics scheme. Analysis of model simulations shows that the shape parameter, which controls the relative width of the droplet size distribution, and the aerosol number concentration have the greatest impact on fog in terms of spatial extent, duration, and surface visibility. Additionally, we find that the influence of the shape parameter is expressed primarily through its effect on microphysical processes and not its effects on the radiative properties of clouds. Higher shape parameter and higher aerosol concentration, both of which reduce mean fall speed of droplets and/or suppress drizzle formation, lead to reduced visibility in fog but also delayed the onset of fog, shortened its lifetimes, and reduced its spatial extent. Chapter 3 employs a modeling experiment conducted on an idealized cloud base lowering fog case to build upon the results of Chapter 2, particularly the link between aerosol, mean fall speed, and the trade-off between the duration/extent and density of fog. We use a single-column model configured with bin microphysics to investigate the interplay among aerosols, microphysics, and CBL fog evolution under diverse meteorological conditions. We find that lower aerosol concentrations lead to earlier fog formation due to faster gravitational settling of larger droplets, which serves to flux moisture downward. Faster gravitational settling (among other mechanisms at low aerosol concentration) also suppresses entrainment at cloud top which aids in keeping the liquid water path high. However, faster gravitational settling also limits the fog water concentration through faster liquid deposition to the surface. It is these counteracting influences of gravitational settling that appear to cause both prolonged fog duration and suppressed fog water concentration. The relative strength of these counteracting influences depends on the environmental conditions.In Chapter 4, we return to the link between the assumed width of droplet size distributions in models and the behavior of simulated fog. We simulate the same idealized CBL fog case from Chapter 3, but with a bulk microphysics scheme to study the relationship between the shape parameter and fog properties. We once again find that higher shape parameter, which corresponds to a narrower droplet size distribution, suppresses fog formation but leads to lower minimum visibility during fog. We then pair this finding with an analysis of in situ observations of droplet size distributions for fog events that occurred on Sable Island to evaluate the implications of how observed fog droplet size distributions (DSDs) are parameterized in models. Most of the fog observations had bimodal DSDs. Conventional model parameterizations, which assume that the DSD follows a gamma PDF, do a poor job qualitatively replicating observed DSDs. Nonetheless, we find minimal overall bias between the mean fall speeds of the observed and approximated DSDs, but find that the collision rates of observed DSDs were better approximated with shape parameters four times greater than those calculated using relative dispersion. The results show that using relative dispersion from fog observations to parameterize DSD could result in models overestimating the duration of fog by up to 20%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207