Migration of Blue Jays in Eastern North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on recoveries of banded birds, Smith (1979) has reported on the migratory movements of Blue Jays inNorth America west of the 100th meridian.With use of banding and recovery records, it is my purpose in preparing this paper to make a fuller analysis than has previously been made of the movements of Blue Jays in eastern North America and to make comparisons of the movements of these birds in eastern North America with those west of the 100th meridian. MethodsFrom the Bird Banding Laboratory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, I obtained a print-out of banding and recapture records of Blue Jays banded in the Atlantic Flyway of the eastern United States and the Canadian provinces east of and including Ontario.For my analysis, Florida, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York were chosen as states with the largest numbers of records and representing different parts of the Blue Jay's range.The print-out sheets were hand-searched for records addressing obvious questions and for information to develop new questions which could be addressed.Based chiefly on information gleaned from the banding and recapture records, the records were classified according to the time the birds could be expected to be on their breeding grounds, on their wintering grounds, or in migration between these two locations.Records of previously banded birds that were captured and released at the same place by the original banders (Banding Laboratory code 99) were separated from those otherwise recaptured, to avoid exaggeration of the number of birds shown not moving.It must be noted also that records of birds banded as locals (birds too young to be capable of sustained flight) define the end of the nesting period for the birds involved, and backward adjustment by the appropriate amount must be made to determine other stages of nesting activity.A word of caution must also be introduced here to warn the reader to remember that, because of differences in sizes of states, the numbers of birds recovered in different states represent different values.I think, however, that these values are exact enough that their comparison can be expected to reveal existing patterns in migratory behavior and thus to justify mapping the recoveries by states. ResultsThis analysis made use of data from 8,002 recaptures from 101,903 banded Blue Jays.Of the 8,002 recaptures, 4,861 were of birds recaptured and released by the bantiers, leaving 3,141 birds recovered other than by the original bantiers, with a recovery rate of 3.1% (Table 1).A tabulation for banding of locals by months showed Jul.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".