MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011510140

Modèle québécois d'économie sociale : reconfiguration du modèle de Desroche

2008· other· fr· W7011510140 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal) · 2008
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicPhysics and Engineering Research Articles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic sectorPower (physics)Work (physics)Control reconfiguration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, les auteures adaptent aux réalités québécoises la définition de l'économie sociale élaborée par Henri Desroche. En plus de repérer les types d'entreprises présents dans chacune des sept composantes du modèle desrochien, elles identifient les zones interfaces entre les composantes du secteur de l'économie sociale (coopératives, mutuelles, associations), et entre celles-ci et les autres secteurs (public, communautaire, syndical, privé). La notion d'interface est ici centrale : elle permet d'illustrer les évolutions et les mouvances qui tirent certaines entreprises des secteurs public et privé vers l'économie sociale et à l'inverse, certaines entreprises de l'économie sociale vers le secteur public ou le secteur privé. La démarche rend nécessaire la reconfiguration du modèle proposé par Desroche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it