MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7011541556

Modelling Tubular Braided Composites Using Geometrical, Micro-Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis Methods

2024· other· en· W7011541556 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMandrelFinite element methodStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesPath (computing)TomographySegmentationComposite numberYarn
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates various modelling approaches for two-dimensional Tubular Braided Composite (TBC) structures. Because of TBCs' flexible nature, modelling them properly is challenging and usually involves some assumptions. However, having an accurate modelling procedure would help researchers and industries obtain more accurate simulation results before manufacturing or using TBCs. In this research, the gap in the modelling of TBCs will be addressed. Some equations are available in the literature to generate geometrical models of TBCs. However, the intricate nature of the equations involved makes creating accurate geometrical models challenging. This research introduces a user-friendly and open-source software, TBC-Gen, which streamlines the modelling process, eliminating the need for extensive knowledge of the underlying equations. Moreover, some modifications have been applied to the equations to enhance the precision of TBC simulations. Comparative analyses are conducted between TBC-Gen outputs, results from other software, and physical TBC samples to investigate the accuracy of the TBC-Gen results. Micro-computed tomography (µCT) proves to be a precise method for scanning TBCs. This study employs µCT to scan various TBCs with different patterns, dimensions, and materials. Different image processing techniques have been developed to extract essential parameters (minor and major yarn and mandrel diameter, center point, orientation, and cross-sectional area of yarns) from the scanned models. Also, an innovative segmentation and splitting algorithm is implemented for overlapping yarns. Subsequently, two yarns from the scanned TBCs are extracted, and their paths are plotted. A simulated yarn path is fitted to the extracted path, and a new parameter is introduced to the geometrical model to enhance the fitness of the yarn paths. The error between the fitted geometrical model and the segmented yarn path is less than 1%. The TBC-Gen program is then utilized to design different geometrical models, and Finite Element Simulations (FEM) are developed to analyze their behaviour under tensile tests. Periodic Boundary Conditions (PBC) are applied to optimize computational efficiency. The impact of braid angle on TBC displacement during tensile testing is investigated by simulating seven models with similar geometries but varying braid angles (30°-70°). Additionally, three TBCs with similar geometries but different patterns are simulated, and their displacements are reported. The result shows that the displacement of simulated TBCs increases as the braid angle increases. Also, the Hercules pattern shows the most displacement and the Diamond pattern shows the least displacement under a similar tensile test. The FEM results are further validated by simulating the setup of an experimental test and comparing the outcomes against both experimental and Classical Laminate Plate Theory (CLPT) results. The FEM results are closer than the CLPT results to the experimental results. This comprehensive research not only advances TBC modelling methodologies but also validates their accuracy through a combination of advanced imaging techniques, innovative algorithms, and rigorous simulations, contributing valuable insights to the field of composite materials. The TBC-Gen program developed in this study can help other researchers and industries generate geometrical models without a deep understanding of the details of the equations. It can also be used for educational and visualization purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)→Same topicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies→French-language works237,207→