MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011563793

Narrowing the Road: Co-Management with Anishnabe at the Riding Mountain National Park (Winnipeg, Manitoba)

2009· article· en· W7011563793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersU.S. Army
KeywordsNational parkSustainabilitySocioeconomic statusProtected areaAgency (philosophy)Land useIndigenous
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"'Parks and protected areas are very much part of the socioeconomic region in which they are located'. From a preconceptual perspective, however, parks and protected areas are established in areas with existing socioeconomic characteristics that should reflect the nature, values and needs of local communities. Past efforts to establish national parks in Canada did not focus on the intimate relationship between Aboriginal traditional land use and the resultant socioeconomic health and well-being that would potentially be impacted when common property territorial lands became designated as protected areas under the earlier or more current versions of the National Parks Act. Consequently, these impacts were, and often continue to be, unmitigated.
\n
\n"This essay is focused on Aboriginal communities adjacent to Riding Mountain National Park (RMNP), a protected area located in the south-western corner of Canada's centrally-located province of Manitoba. Background on the historic approach to establishment and management of Canada's first national park at Banff, Alberta, and RMNP is provided to assist the reader to understand the resulting implications to Canada's Aboriginal peoples. Preliminary results of on-going research for two Aboriginal communities adjacent to RMNP are presented that capture the historic relationship to the lands now integrated within the boundaries of this protected area. From this review, it will be shown that the impacts from establishing RMNP have resulted in adverse change over time to the communities' social, cultural, and economic sustainability through subsequent loss of access to their common property territorial landscape. Parks Canada (the responsible regulatory agency for national parks), through amendments to current regulatory and management practices, are challenged to be more responsive to the needs and aspirations of Aboriginal communities left impaired from national park establishment and without recourse through outstanding land claims."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it