MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011714507

NARST Newsletter, June 1959

2009· other· en· W7011714507 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMinds at UW (University of Wisconsin) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniversitetet i OsloCurtin University of TechnologyUniversity of AlbertaNational Association for Research in Science TeachingRollins CollegeMontana State UniversityBall State UniversityUniversity of West FloridaUniversity of KansasBradley UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of MiamiUniversity of MissouriUniversity of RochesterSyracuse UniversityUniversity of PittsburghDePaul UniversityArizona State UniversityState University of New YorkUniversity of MinnesotaColgate UniversityNella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurological Diseases, Weizmann Institute of ScienceUniversity of LouisvilleSan Diego State UniversityOhio State UniversityOregon State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaPennsylvania State UniversityFlorida State UniversityCarleton CollegePurdue UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityNorth Dakota State University
KeywordsScience educationScience, technology, society and environment educationPlan (archaeology)Higher educationNational Science Education StandardsSocial science education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The science education research community has a long, yet fragmented history with little impact on science teaching and learning in today's schools (Shymansky & Kyle, 1991).Because the public schools are complex systems, reform will require comprehensive efforts for the systemic changes necessary to result in meaningful, long-term reform (Sowder, 1989).Thus, there is a need for the major science education organizations to rethink and articulate a systematic plan for science education research oriented clearly toward the improvement of science teaching and learning; a unique research agenda that clearly articulates their discipline.More importantly, science educators ought to become proactive and far-sighted in their ways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinds at UW (University of Wisconsin)French-language works237,207