Narativní a vizuální specifika ve filmové tvorbě Roberta Lepage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis deals with the work of the Canadian filmmaker, playwright, actor, scenographer and theatre director Robert Lepage, who has until now shot five films during the period of 1995-2003. Systematic and detailed analysis of the chosen topic is accompanied by excursions into the cultural and political context of the Québec province, as Lepage's films are inherently connected with it. Methodologically the thesis is based on formalist analysis and contextual interpretation of Lepage's films. To describe Lepage's narrative style, fragmental and complicated in organization of time and space, the author has come up with a few unorthodox terms (such as "cubist narrative"). The aim of each chapter is to point out that in Lepage's films formal techniques are closely bound with the very nature of his works: searching for Québec's identity and the desire to approach the truth about man in general. After having read this thesis, the reader should conceive Robert Lepage as an author who has gained worldwide popularity in the field of theatre and opera, whose films, however, are still waiting (especially in Europe) to be recognized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".