MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011761359

New techniques for jet calibration with the ATLAS detector

2023· article· en· W7011761359 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Social FundFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftIsrael Science FoundationBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftAustrian Science FundEuropean Regional Development FundBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgence Nationale de la RechercheCERNDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionDanmarks GrundforskningsfondAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundTürkiye Enerji, Nükleer ve Maden Araştırma KurumuNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaCanarie
KeywordsCalibrationAtlas (anatomy)DetectorJet (fluid)Large Hadron ColliderCalorimeter (particle physics)Transverse planeEnergy (signal processing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho)Same topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207