MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7011927891

Trafics postaux

2024· other· en· W7011927891 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationAgency (philosophy)SovereigntyHistoriographyCorporate governanceGlobal governanceAdministration (probate law)Space (punctuation)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The post is the vector for and expression of myriad interactions which shape the sinews of modern and contemporary globalizations. Administrative and commercial correspondence, tourist postcards, migrants’ letters and money orders, parcels with licit and illicit content: though relatively neglected in comparison with telecommunication in the historiography of global communication, these postal communications do more than simply reflect the administration of distant territories, commerce, tourism, and planetary migrations. They shape and are reciprocally shaped by these factors. This perspective sees the emergence of postal global governance as crucial, through the founding of the General Postal Union in 1874, which became the Universal Postal Union in 1878. A specialized agency of the United Nations since 1947, the mission of this international organization is to forge “a single postal territory” of standards, tariffs, and regulations. At the same time, the organization offers its members a space to construct sovereignty in an age of interdependence. Postalizing globalization and, conversely, globalizing national posts: these are the two main contributions of this special issue on postal traffics in a global history perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2850.070

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→French-language works237,207→