Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seven leading female artists explored the notion of narrative, the great unfolder of fact and fiction, in this exhibition presented by ACCA Curator Rebecca Coates. Internationally renowned, others were Tacita Dean (UK); Dorothy Cross (Ireland); Janice Kerbel (Canada) and Rosemarie Trockel (Germany) and fellow Australians Kate Daw and Catherine Bell. <br /><br />They explored the world of narrative through a variety of media including film, photogravure etching, sculpture, painting and installation. The exhibition title derived from a renowned quote from Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, 'It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife' <br /><br />Kosloff's research is around the reinterpretation of everyday scenes and the general milieu of life to challenge the continuum of time and hazes perceptions of time with place and persona. <br /><br /> 'Snap happy' is a black and white Super 8 film in which Kosloff documents a group of tourists as they photograph and experience their surroundings. Her use of outmoded technology to document this contemporary scene plays with our impressions of the past and our assumptions about the present. The Super 8 camera acts as a filter, reinterpreting everyday scenes and disengaging them from a contemporary sense of time and space. This two-minute video work highlights the moving image as simulacra, by drawing attention to the contingency of representational practices in art and daily life. 'Truth explores a particular sensibility,' says ACCA Curator Rebecca Coates. 'There's a questioning, a suggestiveness, a lingering refrain, as narrative is written, rewritten and allowed to remain ambiguous.' Kosloff's Super 8 films explore the subjective process of truth in relation to time, space and memory. These films capture people interacting with the built world, undertaking work and leisure activities.<br /><br />A catalogue of the exhibition was written by Coates and Louise Adler. (ISBN 0947220895).<br />
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".