Bibliographic record
Abstract
Andy, the Canadian government spokesman said that your art could not be described as original sculpture.Would you agree with that?Warhol answers, 'Yes.' 'Why do you agree?' 'Well, because it's not original.''You have just then copied a common item?' 'Yes.'The interviewer gets exasperated.'Why have you bothered to do that?Why not create something new?' 'Because it's easier to do.' "Well, isn't this sort of a joke then that you're playing on the public?' 'No.It gives me something to do'. Entrevista a Andy Warhol en la Stable Gallery.ya no se trata de preguntar '¿qué es el arte?', sino '¿cuándo hay arte?', '¿qué cosa hace el arte?' O hasta '¿cómo nosotros, regardeurs, hacemos arte?' Yves MichaudEl 21 de abril de 1964 Andy Warhol inauguraba su segunda gran exposición en la Stable Gallery de Nueva York, en la que presentaba una serie de reproducciones de cajas comerciales de marcas tan conocidas como el jabón Brillo o los Corn Flakes de Kellogg's.El efecto creado era una aglomeración de cajas amontonadas que marcaban el
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.118 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".